What is better - Marantz NR1609 vs Yamaha RX-V479BL?
The number of channels for receivers is different - 7.2 versus 5.1, respectively, for devices. In terms of power, there are differences, the NR1609 has such a ratio W/Ohm - 50/8, 70/6, while the RX-V479BL has a power of 80/8. The value of total harmonic distortion is also different, and for the NR1609 it is 0.08%, but for the RX-V479BL it is 0.09%.
Competitive models use the same DAC. The Bi-amping function is implemented only in the Marantz NR1609. Both Marantz NR1609 and Yamaha RX-V479BL can transmit an audio signal directly to the amplifier and bypasses any DSP processing. Each of the receivers has a Bluetooth connector. The contenders have differences in the supported services from Apple - AirPlay, AirPlay 2 versus AirPlay respectively. The NR1609 has access to the Spotify service.
Support for the HDR function can only boast of the NR1609. The quality of 4K/60Hz signal remains unchanged when transmitting from a source to a TV or projector via HDMI for both receivers. Signaling over HDMI in standby mode can provide the NR1609 and the RX-V479BL. Video scaling is only possible with the NR1609. Operation with the Dolby Vision is only possible with the NR1609.
The number of HDMI inputs/outputs varies depending on the receiver, the NR1609 has 8/1, and the RX-V479BL has 6/1. HDMI Audio Return Channel is implemented in both devices. HDMI eARC is not supported by the NR1609 and the RX-V479BL. When comparing receivers, it becomes clear that each of the rivals can work with HDMI CEC. NR1609 and RX-V479BL support the standard HDCP 2.2. In the presence of a built-in phono stage for connecting a vinyl player only at Marantz NR1609. There is an ECO mode in either AV receiver. The Marantz NR1609 and the Yamaha RX-V479BL can be properly configured using the setup assistant.
A Dolby Atmos multichannel audio format is available only in the NR1609. Only in the NR1609 realized a DTS:X surround technology.