The Yamaha RX-V483BL vs Cambridge Audio AXR100 comparison proves that these receivers have many common features.
A significant difference between the receivers in the number of channels, Yamaha RX-V483BL has 5.1 versus 2.0 for Cambridge Audio AXR100. Regarding power, then RX-V483BL has such a W/Ohm ratio - 80/6 when AXR100 has a power of 100/8. The THD is 0.09% for the RX-V483BL but 0.01% for the AXR100.
Characteristics of digital to analog converter (DAC) are different, Burr-Brown 192 KHz/24-bit for RX-V483BL and 192 KHz/32-bit for the AXR100. Only the RX-V483BL supports Bi-amping feature. Sound transmission directly to the amplifier in Pure direct (straight) mode is not implemented in these models.
Only the Yamaha RX-V483BL can connect to the Internet via WI-FI. Rivals from our review have Bluetooth support. Only the RX-V483BL supports Spotify. Only the RX-V483BL provides HDMI signal transmission in standby mode. The RX-V483BL can scale the input HDMI signal, unlike the AXR100. Dolby Vision technology found support only on the RX-V483BL. Only the RX-V483BL supports HDMI Audio Return Channel (ARC). Unfortunately, HDMI eARC is not available on monitored devices. Of the two receivers in our comparison, HDMI CEC is present in only the RX-V483BL. The AXR100 has a built-in phono stage for connecting a vinyl player. A voice control is not available. An ECO mode is only available for the RX-V483BL. Unfortunately, the setup assistant is not available in each of the models.
None of the rivals equipped with Dolby Atmos multichannel audio decoder. The receivers do not support the surround sound technology DTS:X.